Cialis
Cialis fr


Candidate Jim Russell’s intellectual racism resembles classic anti-Semitism

*holes, controversy, race, teabaggers

The Christian Conservative running for Westchester County New York’s 18th district turned out to be a very controversial candidate.

Maggie Haberman of politico.com dug up an early nineties quasi-intellectual racist screed of Jim’s from an ultra-right-wing publication, Occidental Quarterly. While the link for “The Western Contribution to World History” has, predictably, been pulled down since the revelation made its way around the web yesterday, thankfully Google docs has a copy of it in its online library.

What’s Jim’s ‘academic’ schtick? It goes something like this:
1.) Our white European ancestors fought off dark (Persian, Moor, Turk) invaders.
2.) This successful defense of Euro-purity allowed us to prosper and flourish.
3.) Now, gee, just look at all the giants of thought and invention and commerce and everything — isn’t our Western culture the absolute best?
4.) But now all the fools around us are into tolerance and race-mixing and social justice. Danger — I say danger — friends.
5.) And also The Jews.

To me, it’s pretty much your classic pseudo-smart-guy with a closet full of Nazi parapher-nalia. His attempt to list and explain, page after page, all the historic western success stories is a laughable thing to try, don’t you think? Where could one possibly begin or end? Especially when he crams one eugenicist after another into the membership, it certainly feels like he’s squeezing rats under the door.

But though he may be somewhat entitled to say what he likes about the threats of ancient hordes, and he may find convenient modern targets of some popularity in multi-culturalism and the like, there remains a threat to Whitey that never seems to go away: the Jews. The olde horde, the new reckless intellectuals, the sly adapters of evolutionary strategies, those Jews are everywhere. They’re smart, sneaky and driven to disrupt your simple, peaceful ways in order to compete with you and win.

An intellectual giant of a sort, none other than T.S. Eliot, knew it:

Eliot described some conditions for an optimal society: ‘The population should be homogeneous. . . . What is still more important is unity of religious background; and reasons of race and culture combine to make any large number of free-thinking Jews undesirable. There must be a proper balance between urban and rural, industrial and agricultural development. And a spirit of excessive tolerance is to be deprecated.’”

Smart-ass Jews. Always trying to mix it up among us, pretending not to have their own agenda. Hell, even their genes are sneaky:

Kevin MacDonald’s work on religion, and particularly Judaism, as a group evolutionary strategy, is essential for a thorough understanding of our current predicament.

The ‘predicament’ being it looks like Whitey might be getting punk’d. Especially when they have been so good at competing with us using that brain-evolved religious thingamajig. Russell pastes what he believes is key research:

“It is not clear why such dedicated neural machinery . . . for religion may have evolved,” the team reported yesterday at a meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in New Orleans. One possibility, the scientists said, was to encourage tribe loyalty or reinforce kinship ties or the stability of a closely knit clan.

There ya go — clans. And clans . .

Anyway, cue Russell’s conveniently partial application of what that implies . .

While Judaism has functioned to sustain the Jewish people, contemporary Western Christianity has, on the contrary, deliberately dissociated itself from its European ethnocultural heritage and has focused on “universal social justice.” There is now a afoot a conscious effort to de-Europeanize and to re-Judaize Christianity, through scriptural revision, internal treachery and external pressure.

Treachery, no less — any Nazi would be proud.

Jews know how to use this evolutionary weapon, and they’d certainly know better than to mess with a good thing. Unless it’s your good thing, Jesus H. Christ. I’d say it’s time to make all of Christianity a Jew-type religion:

One possible strategy to counter these efforts is to encourage a re-Europeanization of Christianity into a European folk religion. Such a strategy might be bolstered by the argument that Euro-Christians should only accept the folk-affirming form of Christianity accepted by our ancestors and not accept the specious “bait and switch” arguments of liberal Christians who try to indoctrinate us with universalist propaganda.

Well, I guess all Jim needs is his own Israel. Then Christian Whitey could unify within a single, circumscribed culture. He can make ‘Jerusalem’ some town in Westchester County and pick his own Nazi Pope — SNAP!

Share
11 COMMENTS

11 Comments

  1. bjkeefe  •  Sep 27, 2010 @6:53 am
    avatar

    Thanks for digging up the cached copy. Should that ever disappear, and you (or anyone else reading this) want it back, let me know, I saved a couple of copies at various places online, too.

    For the record: It does look like the original PDF is either still up or back up on TOQ’s site, at least as of this moment:

    http://www.toqonline.com/archives/v1n2/TOQv1n2Russell.pdf

  2. toma  •  Sep 27, 2010 @11:09 am
    avatar

    I’ll be darned, they put it back up. Thanks bjk. Obviously, taking it down was an admittance that they’re a bunch of whackos with a cowardly streak, but now they’d like to stand their ground. Wonderful. I copied and cached it too, which makes me wonder how good people like you and me ever got into the sorry business of being librarians for racist propaganda.

  3. bjkeefe  •  Oct 2, 2010 @7:56 pm
    avatar

    LOL! I prefer to think of as documentarians of the atrocities.

  4. toma  •  Oct 3, 2010 @11:13 am
    avatar

    Ok! I’ll tattoo that on my computer.

  5. bjkeefe  •  Oct 3, 2010 @4:10 pm
    avatar

    Argh. Meant to say “of us as.” But I gather you gathered that.

  6. bjkeefe  •  Oct 3, 2010 @4:13 pm
    avatar

    BTW, I don’t suppose your handle is from that great* old TV show.

    * (Or so my memories of childhood would have it.)

  7. toma  •  Oct 3, 2010 @5:48 pm
    avatar

    Hey — ding ding! We have a winner.

    When that old show was around, it ended being my nickname (eight year olds don’t have a lot to draw on, I suppose). It’s a pretty convenient nym, it beats ‘typeswithfire’ or ‘nayaplomb’ or some such shenanigans.

    Apparently, Robert Blake took over the ‘Toma’ lead role and turned the show into ‘Barretta.’ He later went on to become a successful O.J. Simpson impersonator.

  8. bjkeefe  •  Oct 3, 2010 @7:22 pm
    avatar

    Heh. I Googled Toma with the idea of adding an explanatory link just in case you had no idea what I was talking about, and then I did not like anything I saw. (On the first page, at least.) But I did note (new info to me) that Robert Blake had tried to horn in on that role after Tony Musante stuck with his one-and-done pledge (well, almost), which was something else that made me have persistent fond memories of that show.

    About handles: yeah. The examples you gave are exactly the sort of thing that contributed to my choice to post under my own meatspace name — I was always afraid that whatever I came up with would be equivalently stupid. However, and if you’ve ever visited Sadly, No!, you’ll know the perfect counterexample: HTML Mencken.

    And then, hell, look at the usernames in the comments under any Wonkette post.

    There is creativity out there that I cannot even pretend to.

    Toma, though, is very very good. And I like its obscurity. Kids these days be all “Eh, his name must be Tom A-something.” So we olds got that going for us, at least.

    High three-and-a-fraction.

    (Geriatrics’ best attempt at high five.)

  9. bjkeefe  •  Oct 3, 2010 @7:27 pm
    avatar

    Argh. I was murky in my first paragraph in the previous comment. Meant to say that Mustante’s walk was what made me like the show more, not that Blake had tried to cheese onto it.

    Never liked that Blake. Though to his credit, Baretta may have been the seed for my love of snark.

    (There are some who would say this is not something to be viewed as a credit, granted.)

  10. toma  •  Oct 3, 2010 @8:17 pm
    avatar

    Meatspace? Ha! That gets a full snort from me, even better than referring to buildings as ‘Bricks And Mortar Entities.’ At some point, someone will try to refer to Earth as a ‘Rugged Real Time Environment,’ or life as a ‘Primary Virtual Reality Source.’

    Which is to say old TV shows were funny, eh? Love Sadly, No! and badly miss Gavin. Commenters at Wonkette are sharp, they probably hate the new layout like I do (see how I did that? pretending to be smart also?). Robert Blake is a psycho. We’re in agreement! High ZZZzzzzz . . [falls asleep at printing press] . . [which oddly prints ambient noise] . .

  11. toma  •  Oct 3, 2010 @9:17 pm
    avatar

    . . and . . linkie! Thanks, Brendan.