Contact
Subscribe
Oct 22, 2009 
This is one of the funniest filings I have ever read. Not that I read (or understand) a lot of these, but this is so non-legal-ese, so petulant, stupid and self-referential as to be good comedy.
First, she filed a bunch of ‘birther soldier’ lawsuits that claimed… Obama was not President–> not Commander-in-Chief–> unable to issue valid orders–> her soldier clients aren’t bound to serve in the current military.
An annoyed U.S. District Court Judge, Clay Land, threw the suit(s) out:
First, Plaintiff’s challenge to her deployment order is frivolous. She has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as President of the United States. Instead, she uses her Complaint as a platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the President is “an illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified imposter.”…
Taitz, who clearly does not take her ‘officer of the court’ privelege seriously, ranted publicly:
“…somebody should consider trying [the judge] for treason and aiding and abetting this massive fraud known as Barack Hussein Obama.”
“This is so outrageous what this judge did — it goes in the face of law and order,” said Taitz, reached at her office in Mission Viego, CA. “Not every judge is as corrupt as Judge Land. Some judges believe in the Constitution. And some judges believe in the rule of law.”…
“I’m not afraid of sanctions. Because I know this is not frivolous. I know this is extremely important — the most important issue in this country today.”
“Judge Land is a typical puppet of the regime — just like in the Soviet Union,”
The judge, in a 43 page statement, then sanctioned her $20,000:
Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct. After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court.
So, having gotten her butt roundly spanked by the court, has she become chastened? Given up on her angry, ‘frivolous’ attacks? Has she come to realize that her case needs to be far more substantial, far more legally compelling? Has she managed to construct even an ort of an argument on her clients’ behalf? Or found a mote of evidence to give the court any reason to re-consider her case? Or will she just return to blasting the judge for all the awful things he keeps doing to ‘her’? Acting like the unhinged idiot she appears to be?
“…Judge Land’s actions that amounted to misstating or misrepresenting ninety percent of what was presented in the pleadings and arguments, completely ignoring ninety percent of the arguments and facts, making extremely rude and demeaning remarks, showing bias; taken together, appear to be designed to silence her, and intimidate her and above all, punish her for what the Court perceived as political rather than “core” constitutional questions.
Judge Lands remarks amounted to nothing short of a political lynching, which turned into a feast and celebration by the media mob…”
Comments Off 
Franks started the town hall off by showing a half-hour video on the country’s missile defense system. The movie warned of threats of a missile attack by rogue nations such as North Korea and Iran and the need to protect the country with a missile defense shield…
–Dear Mr. President: Stop Hiding:
–Obama’s Charlatanie: His Ascendence Disqualifies Him:
–It’s “Just Like” When The “Flat” Earthers Didn’t “Believe” The “Sun” Was “On Fire”:
eligibility requirement is subsequently determined applicable to Barack Obama on the basis of Article 2’s exclusion of dual citizenship birth (doesn’t matter whether Obama born in Hawaii since his dad was Kenyan/British citizen at the time)? It would seem prudent, if not dereliction of Constitutional duty in not so doing, for the United States Senate to defer voting on Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation at the very least until there is determination, now imminent, on standing in Kerchner v. Congress (USDC NJ) on that precise issue (Congressional failure to take up the raised and known constitutional ineligibility question prior to declaring a Presidential winner in the vote of the electoral college). For the full Senate now to proceed to vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor (an otherwise lifetime appointment) before then, would be a knowing and very substantial exacerbation of any inherent Constitutional crisis — compounding the previous Congressional dereliction. That is, the Executive Branch, as well as conceivably all actions of a Congress under a President determined ineligible, would leave the Supreme Court as an essential unfettered remaining Branch of the Federal Government, that is unfettered so long as Mr. Obama’s nominee to the Court is not yet confirmed by the Senate.
^TrInItY^
If that’s the case, the most likely scenario would have to be a shameful deportation to Kenya or Indonesia. I’d say have a taxi pull up to the front lawn of the White House and, drive him to Dulles International and put him on a flight, coach. No pomp, no fanfare, just a disgraceful exit for a disgraceful chapter in American history.
There are way too many players implicated with treason in this for it to be treated as an administrative oversight.
For a guy born in Mombasa, moved to Indonesia etc back to US, quite a feat….Truth come out conveniently so that Rep can shine again??