New York Teabag Republicans want Jim Russell out?

GOP will try to get own candidate off NY ballot
By JIM FITZGERALD (AP) – 1 day ago

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — Republicans will try to remove their own candidate from the ballot in a suburban New York congressional race because he wrote an article warning against racial mingling, a party official said Wednesday.

Jim Russell, 56, a perennial GOP candidate known for his strong opposition to immigration, wrote in 2001 that parents should teach their children “an acceptance of appropriate ethnic boundaries for socialization and for marriage.”

What? He’s a Tea Partier!

I thought the ‘Tea Party’ was the big, new sure-fire political thing. What went wrong? This whole ‘controversy’ confuses me.

Jim Russell is apparently refusing media requests, preferring to remain on the trail. Speaking of which, here’s a random campaign photo I pulled off his VebSittenImaggenShtootEinePixens page:

The Christian Conservative running for Westchester County New York’s 18th district turned out to be a very controversial candidate.

Maggie Haberman of politico.com dug up an early nineties quasi-intellectual racist screed of Jim’s from an ultra-right-wing publication, Occidental Quarterly. While the link for “The Western Contribution to World History” has, predictably, been pulled down since the revelation made its way around the web yesterday, thankfully Google docs has a copy of it in its online library.

What’s Jim’s ‘academic’ schtick? It goes something like this:
1.) Our white European ancestors fought off dark (Persian, Moor, Turk) invaders.
2.) This successful defense of Euro-purity allowed us to prosper and flourish.
3.) Now, gee, just look at all the giants of thought and invention and commerce and everything — isn’t our Western culture the absolute best?
4.) But now all the fools around us are into tolerance and race-mixing and social justice. Danger — I say danger — friends.
5.) And also The Jews.

To me, it’s pretty much your classic pseudo-smart-guy with a closet full of Nazi parapher-nalia. His attempt to list and explain, page after page, all the historic western success stories is a laughable thing to try, don’t you think? Where could one possibly begin or end? Especially when he crams one eugenicist after another into the membership, it certainly feels like he’s squeezing rats under the door.

But though he may be somewhat entitled to say what he likes about the threats of ancient hordes, and he may find convenient modern targets of some popularity in multi-culturalism and the like, there remains a threat to Whitey that never seems to go away: the Jews. The olde horde, the new reckless intellectuals, the sly adapters of evolutionary strategies, those Jews are everywhere. They’re smart, sneaky and driven to disrupt your simple, peaceful ways in order to compete with you and win.

An intellectual giant of a sort, none other than T.S. Eliot, knew it:

Eliot described some conditions for an optimal society: ‘The population should be homogeneous. . . . What is still more important is unity of religious background; and reasons of race and culture combine to make any large number of free-thinking Jews undesirable. There must be a proper balance between urban and rural, industrial and agricultural development. And a spirit of excessive tolerance is to be deprecated.’”

Smart-ass Jews. Always trying to mix it up among us, pretending not to have their own agenda. Hell, even their genes are sneaky:

Kevin MacDonald’s work on religion, and particularly Judaism, as a group evolutionary strategy, is essential for a thorough understanding of our current predicament.

The ‘predicament’ being it looks like Whitey might be getting punk’d. Especially when they have been so good at competing with us using that brain-evolved religious thingamajig. Russell pastes what he believes is key research:

“It is not clear why such dedicated neural machinery . . . for religion may have evolved,” the team reported yesterday at a meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in New Orleans. One possibility, the scientists said, was to encourage tribe loyalty or reinforce kinship ties or the stability of a closely knit clan.

There ya go — clans. And clans . .

Anyway, cue Russell’s conveniently partial application of what that implies . .

While Judaism has functioned to sustain the Jewish people, contemporary Western Christianity has, on the contrary, deliberately dissociated itself from its European ethnocultural heritage and has focused on “universal social justice.” There is now a afoot a conscious effort to de-Europeanize and to re-Judaize Christianity, through scriptural revision, internal treachery and external pressure.

Treachery, no less — any Nazi would be proud.

Jews know how to use this evolutionary weapon, and they’d certainly know better than to mess with a good thing. Unless it’s your good thing, Jesus H. Christ. I’d say it’s time to make all of Christianity a Jew-type religion:

One possible strategy to counter these efforts is to encourage a re-Europeanization of Christianity into a European folk religion. Such a strategy might be bolstered by the argument that Euro-Christians should only accept the folk-affirming form of Christianity accepted by our ancestors and not accept the specious “bait and switch” arguments of liberal Christians who try to indoctrinate us with universalist propaganda.

Well, I guess all Jim needs is his own Israel. Then Christian Whitey could unify within a single, circumscribed culture. He can make ‘Jerusalem’ some town in Westchester County and pick his own Nazi Pope — SNAP!

New York Republican candidate Jim Russell, a Tea Party warm/fuzzy I can safely assume, wrote back in the days of the first W. administration:

“I shall begin by speaking about our ancestors, since it is only right and proper on such an occasion to pay them the honor of recalling what they did.” Thus wrote Thucydides in his History of the Pelopon-nesian War and so it is fitting to pay tribute to those whose deeds contributed toward the creation and defense of our Western Civilization. The deeds of our ancestors, which we have chosen to
commemorate today . .

This was the welcome to his “The Western Contribution to World History.” Published in the pro-Whitey Occidental Quarterly, it is a Caucasian-champion screed. See here, before it’s pulled off the web [ --well, that was fast. No matter, I found a copy of it in Google Docs -- enjoy.].

Have fun reading about “The importance of applying eugenic measures in the West . . “ And reading Russell’s analysis of history from a “Western” (sacred cracker) perspective:

In his book entitled The Birth of Europe, medieval historian Robert Lopez posed the question: “What enabled Europe to emerge finally on top?” His answer was “the absence of great invasions for a thousand years.” Hence we begin our survey of Western contributions by paying tribute to those who, throughout the history of the West, courageously repulsed alien invading forces.

And then, ignoring Lopez’ likely points about the reversals of economic, social, and political progresses by violent intervention, Russell wants to talk about sex. Specifically, the universal catastrophe of race mixing:

It has been demonstrated that finches raised by foster parents of a different species of finch will later exhibit a lifelong sexual attraction toward the alien species. One wonders how a child’s sexual imprinting mechanism is affected by forcible racial integration and near continual exposure to media stimuli promoting interracial contact.

The beautiful and the sacred, the finches, will get the hots for the mud-sparrows. Western civilization will totter. The destruction of vibrant European lineages and pre-eminent American university intellectualism, of the kind here displayed by the racist troglodyte Russell, will follow.

The most serious implication of human sexual imprinting for our genetic future is that it would establish the destructiveness of school integration, especially in the middle and high-school years . .

In the midst of this onslaught against our youth, parents need to be reminded that they have a natural obligation, as essential as providing food and shelter, to instill in their children an acceptance of appropriate ethnic boundaries for socialization and for marriage.

“Appropriate ethnic boundaries for socialization and for marriage” will save our Western Electric Boogaloo. Thank gawd for Tea Party style candidates, they have great ideas. How about this one: large numbers of liberal Jew-People are bad for the United States:

[T.S.] Eliot described some conditions for an optimal society: ‘The population should be homogeneous. . . . What is still more important is unity of religious background; and reasons of race and culture combine to make any large number of free-thinking Jews undesirable. There must be a proper balance between urban and rural, industrial and agricultural development. And a spirit of excessive tolerance is to be deprecated.’”

You know who effectively deprecated the tolerance for the you-know-whos? The You-Know-Whos.